Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Thursday, March 18, 2010
- There were an estimated 3,063,163 living in the US as of March 2008 (of these, 2,596,599 were employed in nursing positions).
- The average age for all licensed nurses rose from 46.8 to 47 years and employed nurses rose from 45.4 to 45.5.
- There are 158, 348 identified NPs
- The number of NPs grew 12.1% over the last 4 years
- There were an estimated 28,369 RNs with a doctoral degree in 2008. This is an increase of 64.4% since 2000.
- The workforce is becoming more diverse. 6.6% of nurses are male (a small jump from 5.8%) but a higher percentage of recent graduates were male from previous (4.1 % prior to 1990 vs. 9.6% since 1990).
- Hispanics are the most rapidly growing group of registered nurses.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
I have tried to refrain from taking the bait from some recent negative opinions regarding nurse practitioner delivered care. Quite frankly, the arguments are old and tired. My goal as a clinician is to deliver the highest quality, evidence-based, and culturally competent care that I am capable of. I refuse to pit NPs versus other professions. We all have our own slightly varied philosophies and approaches to delivering care. Some may prefer the approach of a DO while some choose to see a NP or PA or MD. I believe patients have that right. However, I cannot believe the nonsense and out of context rubbish posted on the AMA's "Virtual Mentor" in a column entitled, "The Primary Care Shortage, Nurse Practitioners, and the Patient-Centered Medical Home." Oh, where to begin!
The opinion piece begins with the patronizing idea that NPs are part of the solution but not THE solution to the primary care crisis in this country. Funny, but I couldn't find a single reference that states NPs want to solely take over primary care. It goes on to give a functional definition of primary care and states:
Primary care serves four important functions in the delivery of health care: (1) first contact access for each new medical need, (2) long-term, person-focused (not disease-focused) care, (3) comprehensive care for the majority of a person’s health related needs, and (4) coordination of care when it must be sought elsewhere.
Wow, that sounds an awful like what NP philosophy is grounded in:
NPs diagnose and treat a wide range of health problems. They have a unique approach and stress both care and cure. Besides clinical care, NPs focus on health promotion, disease prevention, health education and counseling. They help patients make wise health and lifestyle choices. They are truly your Partners in Health. In addition to being top-notch healthcare providers, NPs deliver a unique blend of nursing and medical care. They provide comprehensive, personalized health education and counseling. NPs assist patients in making better lifestyle and health decisions.
The next statement in the piece is truly baffling:
Primary care physicians are the only medical professionals who provide patient-centered, integrated, accessible health care that addresses the large majority of patients’ needs in the context of a sustained partnership with the patient and the community .
Huh?!? Is that your opinion or is that paraphrased? That reference comes from Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, eds. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era.
I could not find any mention of that within the reference. Unfortunately, there is no page number to cite it from. In fact, reading through this very reference, I found:
...[the] definition of primary care...is presented in terms of the function of primary care, not solely in terms of who provides it" (p. 2).
These authors go on to say that critical elements of primary care include: "services provided by primary care clinicians - generally considered to be physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants - but involving a broader array of individuals in a primary care team..." (p.2).
The next few paragraphs suggest that primary care by primary care physicians is *better* than care delivered by anyone else. Of course, these studies aren't even looking at physician-directed care - they just underscore the need for primary care.
Here is another great quote:
statutory regulations. Requiring a collaborative agreement costs practices time and money requiring physicians to co-sign charts, which is not a good use of anyone's time, is retrospective, and has no evidence to support enhanced quality in any way.
Green LA, Dodoo MS, Ruddy G, Fryer GE, Phillips RL, McCann JL, et al. The physician workforce of the
Virtual Mentor (VM) "explores the ethical issues and challenges that students, residents, and other physicians are likely to confront in their training and daily practice." This type of rhetoric only begets further silos among disciplines and misrepresents the nurse practitioner profession where ultimately coordination of care and communication is compromised. Shame on them.
I just had to get that off my chest.